Matthew

Chapter 16

The Demand for a Sign

Parallel: Mark 8:11–13 (Aland §154) ⇆ Compare accounts

Compare: Luke 12:54–56 (Aland §154) ⇆ Compare accounts

1And the Pharisees and Sadducees came, and testing Him they asked Him to show them a sign from heaven.a 2But He answered and said to them, “[When evening comes, you say, ‘Fair weather, for the sky is red’;] 3[and in the morning, ‘Stormy today, for the sky is red and overcast.’ You know how to discern the face of the sky, but can you not discern the signs of the times?]𝔐 TRb 4✦An evil and adulterous generation seeks a sign, and no sign will be given to it except the sign of Jonah.”†c And He left them and went away.

The Leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees

Parallel: Mark 8:14–21 (Aland §155) ⇆ Compare accounts

Compare: Luke 12:1 (Aland §155) ⇆ Compare accounts

5And when the disciples† came to the other side, they had forgotten to take bread. 6And Jesus said to them, “Watch out and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.”d 7And they were reasoning among themselves, saying, “It is because we did not take bread.” 8But Jesus, knowing this, said, “Why are you reasoning among yourselves, you of little faith, that you have no bread?†e 9Do you not yet perceive, nor remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets you took up? 10Nor the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many large baskets you took up?f 11How is it that you do not perceive that I did not speak to you about bread? But beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.”† 12Then they understood that He had not told them to beware of the leaven of bread,† but of the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees.

Peter’s Confession of the Messiah

Parallel: Mark 8:27–30; Luke 9:18–21 (Aland §158) ⇆ Compare accounts

Compare: John 6:67–69 (Aland §158) ⇆ Compare accounts

13Now when Jesus came into the district of , He asked His disciples, saying, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?”†g 14And they said, “Some say John the Baptist; and others, Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”h 15He said to them, “But you, who do you say that I am?” 16And Simon Peter answered and said, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.”i 17And Jesus answered and said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in the heavens.j 18And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church,k and the gates of Hades will not overpower it.l 19I will give you† the keys of the kingdom of the heavens,m and whatever you bind on earth will have been bound in the heavens, and whatever you loose on earth will have been loosed in the heavens.”n 20Then He strictly ordered† the disciples to tell no one that He was the Messiah.†o

Jesus Foretells His Death and Resurrection

Parallel: Mark 8:31–33; Luke 9:22 (Aland §159) ⇆ Compare accounts

21✦From that time Jesus† began to show His disciples that He must go to and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and on the third day be raised.†p 22And Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him, saying, “Far be it from You, Lord! This will by no means happen to You.”q 23But He turned and said to Peter, “Get behind Me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to Me, for you are not setting your mind on the things of God, but on the things of people.”r

Taking Up the Cross

Parallel: Mark 8:34–38; Mark 9:1; Luke 9:23–27 (Aland §160) ⇆ Compare accounts

Compare: John 12:25 (Aland §160) ⇆ Compare accounts

24Then Jesus said to His disciples, “If anyone wants to come after Me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow Me.s 25For whoever wants to save his life will lose it; but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it. 26For what will it profit a person† if he gains the whole world but forfeits his life? Or what will a person give in exchange for his life?t 27✦For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and then He will repay each one according to his conduct.†u 28Truly I say to you, there are some of those standing here who will by no means taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.”v

Ask About the Text

Ask a question about Matthew 16, or about the people, places, and events it describes.

Word Study

Select a word in the text and choose Word Study, or enter a verse and a word.

Context & Translation Notes

Original Reader Horizon • Lexical & Canonical Mesh

a 16:1 — the Pharisees and Sadducees … testing Him (πειράζοντες / peirazontes) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: πειράζω peirazō means to test or put to the proof; it is the verb used of the devil’s temptation of Jesus (4:1, 3) and of the questions put to Him later (19:3; 22:18, 35). “A sign from heaven” (σημεῖον ἐκ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ sēmeion ek tou ouranou) asks for a proof sent by God, “heaven” standing for God as often in Jewish speech. Matthew names both groups together under one article in Greek, as at 3:7 and in 16:6, 11, 12.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: John the Baptist met “Pharisees and Sadducees” coming together to his baptism (3:7). A sign had already been refused to scribes and Pharisees (12:38–39). Israel “tested the Lord” at Massah by demanding proof that He was among them (Exodus 17:7; Deuteronomy 6:16), the verse Jesus quoted against the devil (4:7).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: The two parties were rivals. Josephus says the Sadducees denied the resurrection and any fate beyond human choice and rejected the Pharisees’ traditions, while the Pharisees had the people’s favor (Antiquities 13.297–298; 18.16–17; Jewish War 2.162–166); Luke records them dividing over the resurrection (Acts 23:6–8). The Sadducees were tied to the priestly aristocracy in Jerusalem. Their joining in one demand shows how far opposition to Jesus had spread (MacArthur, Matthew 16–23, on 16:1).

b 16:3 — the face of the sky … the signs of the times (τὸ πρόσωπον τοῦ οὐρανοῦ / to prosōpon tou ouranou) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: πυρράζω pyrrazō means to be fiery red; στυγνάζω stygnazō, to be gloomy or overcast; εὐδία eudia, fair weather; χειμών cheimōn, storm. Here οὐρανός ouranos is the visible sky (standing rule 10), unlike “a sign from heaven” in 16:1. πρόσωπον prosōpon is literally “face,” and TWB keeps “the face of the sky.” διακρίνω diakrinō means to distinguish or judge rightly. NA28 punctuates the last clause as a question. NA28 prints 16:2b–3 in brackets: Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus and other early witnesses lack the words; the Majority Text and Textus Receptus have them (see the textual note).

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: Luke records a similar saying to the crowds, about clouds from the west and the south wind (Luke 12:54–56). Jesus will tell the disciples to learn from the fig tree to recognize that the end is near (24:32–33). The men of Issachar “had understanding of the times, to know what Israel ought to do” (1 Chronicles 12:32).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: Weather lore of this kind was common in the ancient world: a red sky at evening promised a fair day, a red and lowering sky at morning a storm. The rebuke is that those who read the sky with care cannot read what God is doing before their eyes. “The times” (καιροί kairoi) are the appointed seasons of God’s action; in Daniel God “changes times and seasons” (Daniel 2:21).

c 16:4 — the sign of Jonah (τὸ σημεῖον Ἰωνᾶ / to sēmeion Iōna) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: The words repeat 12:39 almost exactly; here Matthew does not add “the prophet” (see the textual note). μοιχαλίς moichalis, “adulterous,” uses the language of marriage for unfaithfulness to God. “He left them and went away” (καταλιπὼν αὐτοὺς ἀπῆλθεν katalipōn autous apēlthen) marks a break.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: At 12:40 Jesus explained the sign: as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so the Son of Man will be in the heart of the earth. The prophets called Israel’s idolatry adultery (Jeremiah 3:8–9; Hosea 2:2; Ezekiel 16:32). Nineveh repented at Jonah’s preaching (Jonah 3:4–5; Matthew 12:41).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: Jesus refuses to perform a proof on demand. The only sign this generation will receive is His death and resurrection, the same sign He foretells openly from 16:21 on. Repeating the saying underlines that the refusal is deliberate.

d 16:6 — the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees (τῆς ζύμης / tēs zymēs) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: ζύμη zymē is leaven, a piece of old fermented dough kept back and worked into new dough to make it rise. ὁράω horaō (“watch out”) and προσέχω prosechō (“beware,” “pay attention”) are paired for emphasis. In 16:12 Matthew explains the image: the leaven is “the teaching” (διδαχή didachē) of the two parties.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: Israel removed all leaven from their houses at Passover (Exodus 12:15–20). Luke reports, “Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy” (Luke 12:1); Mark has “the leaven of the Pharisees and the leaven of Herod” (Mark 8:15). Paul uses leaven for corrupting influence: “a little leaven leavens the whole lump” (1 Corinthians 5:6–8; Galatians 5:9). In the parable of 13:33 leaven pictures the hidden growth of the kingdom, so the image works in both directions.

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: Because leaven passed on fermentation from batch to batch, it served as a picture of influence that spreads unseen. Plutarch records that the Roman priest of Jupiter was forbidden to touch leaven, since it is itself the product of corruption and corrupts the flour it is mixed with (Plutarch, Roman Questions 109). Jesus names teaching, not bread, as the danger.

e 16:8 — you of little faith (ὀλιγόπιστοι / oligopistoi) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: ὀλιγόπιστος oligopistos means “having little faith.” In the Gospels it is almost Matthew’s own word, and it is always spoken by Jesus to disciples, never to outsiders. In 16:7 ὅτι hoti is read as “because”: the disciples suppose Jesus spoke of leaven because they had no bread; it could also simply introduce their words (“We did not take bread”). γνούς gnous (“knowing this,” as in 12:15) is the participle of γινώσκω ginōskō, to know.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: Jesus uses the same address over worry about food and clothing (6:30), in the storm (8:26), and when Peter sank in the water (14:31); later He traces the disciples’ failure to heal to their “little faith” (17:20).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: The rebuke is gentle in form: “little faith” is not unbelief. The disciples have seen two feedings and still worry about one forgotten meal; Jesus’ question points them back to what they have seen.

f 16:10 — baskets … large baskets (κοφίνους … σπυρίδας / kophinous … spyridas) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: Matthew keeps the two words for “basket” from the two feedings exactly: κόφινος kophinos for the twelve baskets after the five thousand (14:20) and σπυρίς spyris for the seven large baskets after the four thousand (15:37). TWB follows him with “baskets” and “large baskets.” νοέω noeō, “perceive,” is the verb of 15:17.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: Mark keeps the same distinction (Mark 8:19–20). A σπυρίς spyris was big enough to lower Paul over the wall of Damascus (Acts 9:25).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: The κόφινος kophinos was a stiff wicker basket, which the Roman satirist Juvenal associated with Jews carrying their food (Satires 3.14; 6.542). The σπυρίς spyris was a large plaited basket or hamper. Keeping the two words shows that the disciples are being asked to remember two distinct events.

g 16:13 — Caesarea Philippi … the Son of Man (Καισαρείας τῆς Φιλίππου / Kaisareias tēs Philippou) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: μέρη merē, “district,” is the word used of Tyre and Sidon (15:21). Jesus asks about “the Son of Man” (ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου ho huios tou anthrōpou), the title He uses most often of Himself, and then asks, “But you, who do you say that I am?” (16:15). “He said” renders the present tense λέγει legei (standing rule 17); Matthew’s shift into the present marks the decisive question.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: Mark says that the question was asked “on the way” to the villages of Caesarea Philippi (Mark 8:27); Luke, that Jesus was praying alone (Luke 9:18). In Daniel’s vision “one like a son of man” comes with the clouds of heaven to the Ancient of Days and receives everlasting dominion, while thrones are set and the court sits (Daniel 7:9–14). Jesus will claim that vision before the high priest (Matthew 26:64).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: Caesarea Philippi lay at the foot of Mount Hermon, by one of the springs of the Jordan. The place was called Panium, after a cave sacred to the Greek god Pan; Herod the Great built a white marble temple there in honor of Augustus (Josephus, Antiquities 15.363–364; Jewish War 1.404–406), and his son Philip the tetrarch enlarged the town and named it Caesarea (Antiquities 18.28; Jewish War 2.168). It stood just east of Dan, Israel’s traditional northern border and the site of Jeroboam’s golden calf (1 Kings 12:29), and at the edge of the land the Bible links with the giant clans (see the note on 16:18). Jesus asks the question of His identity in a place crowded with the claims of other gods (MacArthur, Matthew 16–23, on 16:13).

h 16:14 — John the Baptist … Elijah … Jeremiah (Ἰερεμίαν / Ieremian) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: Only Matthew names Jeremiah; Mark and Luke have “one of the prophets” (Mark 8:28; Luke 9:19). ἕτεροι heteroi, “still others,” follows οἱ μέν … ἄλλοι δέ hoi men … alloi de, three groups in turn.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: Herod Antipas had said that Jesus was John raised from the dead (14:2). Malachi promised that God would send Elijah before the day of the Lord (Malachi 4:5), and Jesus identified John as that Elijah (11:14; 17:12–13). Moses promised a prophet like himself (Deuteronomy 18:15). Jeremiah was the prophet who wept over Jerusalem and suffered rejection from his own people, and Matthew alone quotes him by name (2:17; 27:9).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: Jewish writings of the period gave Jeremiah a continuing role. In 2 Maccabees he hides the tent, the ark and the altar of incense in a cave on the mountain from which Moses saw the land, to remain until God gathers His people (2 Maccabees 2:1–8), and he appears in a dream to Judas Maccabeus, handing him a golden sword from God (15:13–16). 2 Esdras promises the sending of “Isaiah and Jeremiah” (2 Esdras 2:18). The crowds rank Jesus with Israel’s greatest prophets, but no higher (MacArthur, Matthew 16–23, on 16:14).

i 16:16 — the Messiah, the Son of the living God (ὁ χριστὸς ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ θεοῦ τοῦ ζῶντος / ho christos ho huios tou theou tou zōntos) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: Χριστός Christos, “Anointed One,” is rendered “Messiah” (standing rule 9). Peter adds “the Son of the living God.” ζῶν zōn, “living,” describes God as alive and acting, in contrast to idols.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: God promised David’s heir, “I will be a father to him, and he will be a son to Me” (2 Samuel 7:14), and says to His anointed king, “You are My Son” (Psalm 2:7). The disciples in the boat had already worshiped Jesus as “the Son of God” (14:33); the high priest will put the same words to Him under oath (26:63). “The living God” sets Israel’s God against the idols (Jeremiah 10:10; 1 Thessalonians 1:9), and Hosea promised that Israel would be called “sons of the living God” (Hosea 1:10).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: In Israel’s Scriptures the nations’ gods were real spiritual beings set over the nations, yet under God and judged by Him (Deuteronomy 32:8–9; Psalm 82). Canaanite religion knew a god who died and returned: the Ugaritic texts tell how Baal went down to Mot (Death), and El rejoiced when he learned that “mightiest Baal is alive” (KTU 1.6 III). Spoken where Pan and the emperor had shrines, Peter’s confession names the God who simply lives, and Jesus as His Son.

j 16:17 — Simon Bar-Jonah … flesh and blood (Σίμων Βαριωνᾶ / Simōn Bariōna) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: Βαριωνᾶ Bariōna is Aramaic בַּר יוֹנָה bar Yônâ, “son of Jonah.” John calls Peter’s father John (Ἰωάννης Iōannēs; John 1:42; 21:15–17), and Jonah may be a short form of that name. “Flesh and blood” (σὰρξ καὶ αἷμα sarx kai haima) means human beings as such. ἀποκαλύπτω apokalyptō, “reveal,” is the verb of 11:25–27.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: Jesus had thanked the Father for hiding these things from the wise and revealing them to infants, adding that no one knows the Son except the Father (11:25–27). Paul says that God revealed His Son to him, and that he did not then consult “flesh and blood” (Galatians 1:15–16; compare 1 Corinthians 15:50).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: “Flesh and blood” is a Jewish expression for mortal humanity (Sirach 14:18; 17:31), common in later rabbinic writing as well. Because the title comes from Jonah, some interpreters see a link with “the sign of Jonah” just given (16:4), though the name more likely reflects Peter’s family.

k 16:18 — you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church (σὺ εἶ Πέτρος, καὶ ἐπὶ ταύτῃ τῇ πέτρᾳ / sy ei Petros, kai epi tautē tē petra) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: Πέτρος Petros (“Peter”) and πέτρα petra (“rock”) are the masculine and feminine forms of one word; in Aramaic both would be כֵּיפָא kêpāʾ, the name Paul uses, “Cephas” (John 1:42; 1 Corinthians 15:5; Galatians 2:9). ἐκκλησία ekklēsia, “church,” appears here for the first time in the Gospels (again at 18:17). In the Septuagint it renders קָהָל qāhāl, the assembly of Israel gathered before God (Deuteronomy 9:10; 31:30). “My church” makes it Jesus’ own assembly.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: Jesus told of the wise man who built his house on the rock (7:24). God laid in Zion “a tested stone, a precious cornerstone” (Isaiah 28:16), and called Israel to look to “the rock from which you were hewn,” Abraham (Isaiah 51:1–2). The church is built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus being the cornerstone (Ephesians 2:20); no foundation can be laid but Jesus Christ (1 Corinthians 3:11); believers are living stones built on the chosen cornerstone (1 Peter 2:4–6).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: What “this rock” refers to has long divided interpreters. Catholic teaching holds that the rock is Peter himself, given a lasting office continued in the bishops of Rome. Many Protestant scholars also take the rock to be Peter, as the first of the apostles on whom the church was founded (compare Ephesians 2:20), without a continuing office. Orthodox writers and many Protestant interpreters, following several church fathers, take the rock to be Peter’s confession of faith (16:16), which every bishop and believer shares; others see Christ Himself as the rock (1 Corinthians 10:4). TWB presents these views without choosing among them. The Greek wordplay is plain whichever view is taken.

l 16:18 — the gates of Hades will not overpower it (πύλαι ᾅδου οὐ κατισχύσουσιν αὐτῆς / pylai hadou ou katischysousin autēs) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: ᾅδης hadēs, “Hades,” is the realm of the dead, the Greek word the Septuagint uses for שְׁאוֹל šĕʾôl, Sheol (compare 11:23). κατισχύω katischyō means to be strong against, prevail over, overpower (Luke 23:23).

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: “The gates of Sheol” and “the gates of death” are biblical phrases for the power of death (Isaiah 38:10; Job 38:17; Psalm 9:13; 107:18; Wisdom 16:13). The risen Christ holds “the keys of death and of Hades” (Revelation 1:18).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: Across the ancient Near East the underworld was pictured as a city with gates: in the Akkadian Descent of Ishtar the goddess must pass through seven gates of the netherworld (ANET 106–109). Caesarea Philippi lay at the foot of Hermon, where 1 Enoch places the descent of the rebel “sons of God,” the Watchers (1 Enoch 6:6; compare Genesis 6:1–4), and near the waters of Dan where Enoch received his vision against them (1 Enoch 13:7). The land around it, Bashan, was the realm of Og, “of the remnant of the Rephaim” (Deuteronomy 3:11; Joshua 12:4), and the Ugaritic texts place the Rapiu, figures linked with the shades of the dead, in Ashtaroth and Edrei, Og’s two cities (KTU 1.108). Some interpreters therefore hear in Jesus’ words a challenge to the powers associated with that place; others note that “the gates of Hades” is a standard phrase for death that needs no local reference. Either way, death and the powers behind it will not prevail against Jesus’ assembly.

m 16:19 — the keys of the kingdom of the heavens (τὰς κλεῖδας τῆς βασιλείας τῶν οὐρανῶν / tas kleidas tēs basileias tōn ouranōn) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: κλείς kleis is a key; Greek σοι soi, “you,” is singular, spoken to Peter. Jesus will accuse the scribes and Pharisees of shutting the kingdom of the heavens in people’s faces (23:13), and the lawyers of taking away “the key of knowledge” (Luke 11:52).

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: God gave Eliakim, steward of the king’s house, “the key of the house of David,” so that “he shall open, and none shall shut; and he shall shut, and none shall open” (Isaiah 22:22); the risen Christ claims that key (Revelation 3:7). In Acts Peter is the first to open the gospel to the Jews at Pentecost (Acts 2) and to the Gentiles at the house of Cornelius (Acts 10).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: In the royal courts of the ancient Near East the steward who held the palace keys controlled access to the king (Isaiah 22:15, 22). Interpreters differ over what the keys give Peter: authority to teach and decide for the church, the opening of the kingdom through preaching, or an office handed on to others. TWB notes the debate without settling it.

n 16:19 — will have been bound in the heavens (ἔσται δεδεμένον ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς / estai dedemenon en tois ouranois) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: “Bind” (δέω deō) and “loose” (λύω lyō) are joined to a future perfect form (ἔσται δεδεμένον estai dedemenon, literally “will be having been bound”). TWB keeps the form as “will have been bound,” which suggests that what is decided on earth matches what heaven has already decided. Some grammarians argue that the construction carries no such sense and should be rendered simply “will be bound”; the question was debated in print by J. R. Mantey and H. J. Cadbury (Journal of Biblical Literature 58 [1939]). The same words are spoken to all the disciples in 18:18.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: In 18:18 binding and loosing concern a member who sins and will not listen to the church. After the resurrection Jesus gives the disciples authority to forgive and retain sins (John 20:23). Jesus criticizes the scribes for binding heavy burdens on people (23:4). The Jerusalem council decides “it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us” (Acts 15:28).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: In Jewish usage “bind” and “loose” (Aramaic אֲסַר ʾăsar and שְׁרָא šĕrāʾ) meant to forbid and to permit, the vocabulary of teachers ruling on the Law. Josephus says that under Queen Alexandra the Pharisees came to “loose and bind whom they would” (Jewish War 1.111). Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant traditions understand the authority differently: for teaching, for discipline and the forgiveness of sins, or for both; and as given to Peter alone, to the apostles, or to the church.

o 16:20 — to tell no one that He was the Messiah (ἵνα μηδενὶ εἴπωσιν / hina mēdeni eipōsin) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: διαστέλλομαι diastellomai means to give strict orders. Mark has ἐπιτιμάω epitimaō, “sternly warned” (Mark 8:30), and some manuscripts of Matthew read that verb (see the textual note).

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: Jesus often told those He healed to say nothing (8:4; 12:16), and after the transfiguration He told the three disciples to tell no one until the Son of Man was raised (17:9). After the feeding of the five thousand the crowd tried to make Him king by force (John 6:15).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: Popular hope looked for a son of David who would “purge Jerusalem from Gentiles” and “destroy the unlawful nations with the word of his mouth” (Psalms of Solomon 17:21–25). Announced in public, the title “Messiah” would have been heard as a call to revolt. Jesus first teaches the disciples what kind of Messiah He is (16:21).

p 16:21 — From that time Jesus began to show (ἀπὸ τότε ἤρξατο ὁ Ἰησοῦς / apo tote ērxato ho Iēsous) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: “From that time Jesus began” repeats 4:17 word for word, where Jesus began to proclaim the kingdom. Matthew uses it to open the second main part of his story: the road to the cross. δεῖ dei, “must,” expresses necessity under God’s plan. ἐγερθῆναι egerthēnai, “be raised,” is passive, as in 14:2. The elders, chief priests and scribes are the three groups that made up the Sanhedrin.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: This is the first of three predictions of the passion (16:21; 17:22–23; 20:18–19). The Servant would be crushed and yet “see His offspring” and “prolong His days” (Isaiah 53:10–12). Hosea had said, “On the third day He will raise us up” (Hosea 6:2), and Jesus had already given the sign of Jonah (12:40).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: No Jewish group of the time expected a Messiah who would be killed by Israel’s own leaders and then raised. The prediction overturns the hopes Peter has just voiced, which explains his reaction in 16:22.

q 16:22 — Far be it from You, Lord! (ἵλεώς σοι, κύριε / hileōs soi, kyrie) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: ἵλεώς σοι hileōs soi is literally “merciful to you,” short for “May God be merciful to you,” a way of saying “God forbid.” TWB uses the English idiom. οὐ μὴ ἔσται σοι τοῦτο ou mē estai soi touto: “This will by no means happen to You” (standing rule 25). Peter “began to rebuke” Jesus (ἐπιτιμάω epitimaō), the verb Jesus uses for rebuking winds and demons (8:26; 17:18).

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: The Septuagint uses the same idiom: “Far be it from me” (2 Samuel 20:20; 1 Chronicles 11:19; 1 Maccabees 2:21). Peter will again insist that he knows better, the night Jesus is betrayed (26:33–35).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: A disciple did not correct his teacher in public; taking Jesus aside, Peter tries to spare Him the shame of rebuke while rebuking Him all the same.

r 16:23 — Get behind Me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to Me (ὕπαγε ὀπίσω μου, σατανᾶ· σκάνδαλον εἶ ἐμοῦ / hypage opisō mou, satana; skandalon ei emou) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: ὕπαγε hypage, “go,” with σατανᾶ satana recalls 4:10, where Jesus sent the devil away when he offered a crown without a cross. σκάνδαλον skandalon is a stumbling block, a trap; the rock of 16:18 has become a stone to trip over. φρονέω phroneō means to set one’s mind on, to think in a certain way.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: שָׂטָן śāṭān in Hebrew means “adversary.” It is used of human opponents (David to the sons of Zeruiah, 2 Samuel 19:22; Hadad, 1 Kings 11:14) and of the accuser in God’s court (Job 1:6–12; Zechariah 3:1–2). Isaiah calls the Lord “a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense” to both houses of Israel (Isaiah 8:14).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: In the heavenly council of Job and Zechariah, “the satan” is the one who challenges and accuses. Jesus hears in Peter’s words the same temptation He met in the wilderness, to take the kingdom without suffering (4:8–10). “Behind Me” is also the place of a disciple, who follows his master: the same words open 16:24, “If anyone wants to come after Me.”

s 16:24 — deny himself and take up his cross (ἀπαρνησάσθω ἑαυτὸν καὶ ἀράτω τὸν σταυρὸν αὐτοῦ / aparnēsasthō heauton kai aratō ton stauron autou) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: ἀπαρνέομαι aparneomai, “deny,” is the verb used of Peter’s denial of Jesus (26:34, 35, 75). αἴρω airō means to lift and carry. σταυρός stauros is the cross, or the crossbeam a condemned man carried. Luke adds “daily” (Luke 9:23).

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: Jesus had already said that whoever does not take his cross and follow Him is not worthy of Him (10:38). Simon of Cyrene will be forced to carry Jesus’ cross (27:32). Paul writes, “I have been crucified with Christ” (Galatians 2:20).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: Crucifixion was a familiar sight in Roman Palestine. Josephus records that the Hasmonean king Alexander Jannaeus crucified eight hundred of his Jewish opponents (Antiquities 13.380), and that after Herod’s death the Roman governor Varus crucified two thousand rebels (Antiquities 17.295; MacArthur, Matthew 16–23, on 16:24). Plutarch notes that each criminal condemned to death carries his own cross (On the Delays of the Divine Vengeance 9). To take up the cross was to walk the road of the condemned.

t 16:26 — forfeits his life … in exchange for his life (ψυχή / psychē) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: ψυχή psychē can mean “life” or “soul.” Behind it stands Hebrew נֶפֶשׁ nepheš, the whole living self, the person. It occurs four times in 16:25–26, and TWB renders it “life” each time so that the reader sees one word carried through the saying: save your life and lose it, lose it and find it, gain the world and forfeit it. Many English versions use “life” in 16:25 and “soul” in 16:26, because 16:27 shows that the stakes are eternal; the Greek has the same word throughout. The verbs are the language of trade: ὠφελέω ōpheleō, to profit; κερδαίνω kerdainō, to gain, a merchant’s word; ζημιόω zēmioō, to suffer loss, take a loss on a deal, forfeit; and ἀντάλλαγμα antallagma, what is given in exchange, the price.

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: TWB renders ψυχή psychē “soul” at 10:28, where it is contrasted with the body, and “life” at 10:39, the saying repeated here. “No man can by any means redeem his brother or give to God a ransom for him, for the redemption of their soul is costly” (Psalm 49:7–8). The rich fool hears, “This night your soul is required of you” (Luke 12:20).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: The picture is a merchant balancing his accounts: on one side the whole world, on the other the self. Even the best bargain loses if the price is one’s own life, which nothing can buy back. The next verse sets the account before the Judge: the Son of Man will come and “repay each one” (16:27), so the loss is final, for eternity and not only for this life. The Son of Man alone gives His life as a ransom for many (20:28).

u 16:27 — come in the glory of His Father with His angels (μετὰ τῶν ἀγγέλων αὐτοῦ / meta tōn angelōn autou) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: μέλλει mellei, “is going to,” points to what is certain to come. “His angels” belong to the Son of Man (also 13:41; 24:31). πρᾶξις praxis is conduct, a way of acting. The words recall Psalm 62:12 and Proverbs 24:12, where God “will repay each according to his work” (ἔργα erga); because Matthew’s wording differs, they are not set in capitals (standing rule 6).

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: Daniel saw thrones set and the Ancient of Days attended by thousands upon thousands, and one like a son of man coming with the clouds to receive dominion (Daniel 7:9–14). “The Lord my God will come, and all the holy ones with Him” (Zechariah 14:5). The Son of Man will come “in His glory, and all the angels with Him” (25:31). Paul quotes the same principle of judgment (Romans 2:6).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: In Israel’s Scriptures God is surrounded by His heavenly host, the council of “holy ones” (Psalm 89:5–7; Deuteronomy 33:2). Jesus pictures that host as His own retinue, coming with Him to judgment. Sirach likewise says that God “will repay mankind according to their deeds” (Sirach 35:22).

v 16:28 — some … who will by no means taste death until they see (οὐ μὴ γεύσωνται θανάτου / ou mē geusōntai thanatou) ↩ back to text

Tier 1 — Lexical Anchor: “Taste death” is a Semitic way of saying “die” (John 8:52; Hebrews 2:9). οὐ μή ou mē is rendered “by no means” (standing rule 25). Mark and Luke have “until they see the kingdom of God” (Mark 9:1; Luke 9:27); Matthew has “the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.”

Tier 2 — Canonical Mesh: Six days later three of the disciples see Jesus transfigured in glory (17:1–8), and 2 Peter recalls that sight as a witness to “the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ” (2 Peter 1:16–18). After the resurrection Jesus says, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to Me” (28:18).

Tier 3 — Historical / Cosmological Horizon: Interpreters differ over what the disciples would see: the transfiguration, which follows at once in all three Gospels; the resurrection and Jesus’ enthronement; the coming of the Spirit and the growth of the church; the judgment on Jerusalem in A.D. 70; or the final coming. Some combine several of these. TWB presents the views without choosing among them.

Textual Notes

NA28/UBS5 • Majority Text (𝔐) • Textus Receptus (TR)

† 16:3 — 16:2b–3, the signs of the sky ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text, in brackets), 𝔐 and TR: [ὀψίας γενομένης λέγετε· εὐδία … τὰ δὲ σημεῖα τῶν καιρῶν οὐ δύνασθε;] ([opsias genomenēs legete; eudia … ta de sēmeia tōn kairōn ou dynasthe?]), “[When evening comes, you say, ‘Fair weather’ … but can you not discern the signs of the times?]”Witnesses: Codex Ephraemi (C, 5th c.), Codex Bezae (D, 5th c.), Codex Washingtonianus (W, about 400), Codex Regius (L, 8th c.), uncials K, N, Δ, Codex Koridethi (Θ, 9th c.), Family 1 (f¹), minuscules 33, 565, 700, 892, 1241, 1424, the majority of later Greek manuscripts (𝔐), and all the Latin witnesses, the Peshitta and Harklean Syriac, and some Bohairic manuscripts; also Eusebius
  • Other manuscripts: (16:2b–3 absent) (), “But He answered and said to them, “An evil and adulterous generation …””Witnesses: Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ, 4th c.), Codex Vaticanus (B, 4th c.), Family 13 (f¹³), minuscule 579, the Old Syriac, and the Sahidic Coptic, the Middle Egyptian Coptic and some Bohairic manuscripts; also Origen, and manuscripts known to Jerome

Why the editors chose the NA28 reading: The words are missing from the two oldest complete manuscripts, and their imagery differs from Luke’s parallel (Luke 12:54–56), so many think a scribe added them from another source. They are old and widely attested, however, so NA28 keeps them in brackets. The Majority Text and Textus Receptus also add “Hypocrites!” in 16:3 (“O hypocrites, you know how to discern…,” KJV); the witnesses for that word have not yet been verified against the apparatus.

Effect on the translation: Significant: two sentences about reading the sky are present or absent.

† 16:4 — the sign of Jonah ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text): τὸ σημεῖον Ἰωνᾶ (to sēmeion Iōna), “the sign of Jonah”Witnesses: Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ, 4th c.), Codex Vaticanus (B, 4th c.), Codex Bezae (D, 5th c.), Codex Regius (L, 8th c.), minuscules 579, 700, most Latin witnesses, and the Sahidic Coptic
  • 𝔐 and TR: τὸ σημεῖον Ἰωνᾶ τοῦ προφήτου (to sēmeion Iōna tou prophētou), “the sign of the prophet Jonah (KJV)”Witnesses: Codex Ephraemi (C, 5th c.), uncials K, N, W, Γ, Δ, Codex Koridethi (Θ, 9th c.), Family 1 (f¹), Family 13 (f¹³), minuscules 33, 565, 892, 1241, 1424, the majority of later Greek manuscripts (𝔐), Old Latin manuscripts, the Syriac versions, and the Bohairic Coptic, the Clementine Vulgate, and the Middle Egyptian Coptic

Why the editors chose the NA28 reading: “The prophet” matches the same saying at 12:39, which scribes would naturally have brought into line.

Effect on the translation: None in meaning.

† 16:5 — the disciples ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text): οἱ μαθηταί (hoi mathētai), “the disciples”Witnesses: Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ, 4th c.), Codex Vaticanus (B, 4th c.), Codex Ephraemi (C, 5th c.), Codex Koridethi (Θ, 9th c.), Family 13 (f¹³), and minuscule 892
  • 𝔐 and TR: οἱ μαθηταὶ αὐτοῦ (hoi mathētai autou), “His disciples”Witnesses: uncials K, L, N, W, Γ, Family 1 (f¹), minuscules 33, 565, 579, 1241, 1424, the majority of later Greek manuscripts (𝔐), most Latin witnesses, the Syriac versions, and the Bohairic Coptic

Effect on the translation: None in meaning.

† 16:8 — that you have no bread ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text): ὅτι ἄρτους οὐκ ἔχετε (hoti artous ouk echete), “that you have no bread”Witnesses: Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ, 4th c.), Codex Vaticanus (B, 4th c.), Codex Bezae (D, 5th c.), Codex Koridethi (Θ, 9th c.), Family 13 (f¹³), minuscules 579, 700, 892, 1241, most Latin witnesses, and the Bohairic Coptic
  • 𝔐 and TR: ὅτι ἄρτους οὐκ ἐλάβετε (hoti artous ouk elabete), “because you took no bread”Witnesses: Codex Ephraemi (C, 5th c.), uncials K, L, W, Γ, Δ, Family 1 (f¹), minuscules 33, 565, 1424, the majority of later Greek manuscripts (𝔐), the Syriac versions, and the Sahidic Coptic; also Eusebius

Why the editors chose the NA28 reading: “You took” repeats the disciples’ own words in 16:7. 𝔐 and TR also read “He said to them”; the witnesses for “to them” have not yet been verified.

Effect on the translation: Slight.

† 16:11 — But beware of the leaven ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text): οὐ περὶ ἄρτων εἶπον ὑμῖν; προσέχετε δὲ ἀπὸ τῆς ζύμης (ou peri artōn eipon hymin? prosechete de apo tēs zymēs), “I did not speak to you about bread? But beware of the leaven”Witnesses: Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ, 4th c.), Codex Vaticanus (B, 4th c.), Codex Ephraemi as first written (C∗, 5th c.), Codex Regius (L, 8th c.), Codex Koridethi (Θ, 9th c.), Family 1 (f¹), and the Coptic versions
  • 𝔐 and TR: οὐ περὶ ἄρτου εἶπον ὑμῖν προσέχειν ἀπὸ τῆς ζύμης (ou peri artou eipon hymin prosechein apo tēs zymēs), “I did not speak to you concerning bread, that you should beware of the leaven (KJV)”Witnesses: For “that you should beware”: uncials K, W, Γ, Δ, minuscules 565, 700, 892, and the majority of later Greek manuscripts (𝔐), and the Harklean Syriac

Effect on the translation: Slight: NA28 has a question followed by a new command; 𝔐 and TR make one sentence.

† 16:12 — the leaven of bread ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text): τῆς ζύμης τῶν ἄρτων (tēs zymēs tōn artōn), “the leaven of bread (literally “of the loaves”)”Witnesses: a corrector of Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ²), Codex Vaticanus (B, 4th c.), Codex Regius (L, 8th c.), minuscules 892, 1241, most Latin witnesses, and the Coptic versions; also Origen
  • 𝔐 and TR: τῆς ζύμης τοῦ ἄρτου (tēs zymēs tou artou), “the leaven of bread”Witnesses: Codex Ephraemi (C, 5th c.), uncials K, W, Γ, Δ, minuscule 700, and the majority of later Greek manuscripts (𝔐), the Peshitta and Harklean Syriac
  • Codex Sinaiticus (first hand): τῆς ζύμης τῶν Φαρισαίων καὶ Σαδδουκαίων (tēs zymēs tōn Pharisaiōn kai Saddoukaiōn), “the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees”Witnesses: Codex Sinaiticus as first written (ℵ∗, 4th c.), with Old Latin ff¹ and (with small differences) minuscule 579 and the Curetonian Syriac
  • Other manuscripts: τῆς ζύμης (tēs zymēs), “the leaven (no further words)”Witnesses: Codex Bezae (D, 5th c.), Codex Koridethi (Θ, 9th c.), Family 13 (f¹³), and minuscule 565, Old Latin manuscripts, and the Sinaitic Syriac

Why the editors chose the NA28 reading: The first hand of Sinaiticus repeats the phrase from 16:11; others shorten it. NA28’s plural and 𝔐’s singular say the same in English.

Effect on the translation: Slight.

† 16:13 — Who do people say the Son of Man is? ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text): τίνα λέγουσιν οἱ ἄνθρωποι εἶναι τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου; (tina legousin hoi anthrōpoi einai ton huion tou anthrōpou?), “Who do people say the Son of Man is?”Witnesses: Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ, 4th c.), Codex Vaticanus (B, 4th c.), the uncial fragment 0281, minuscules 579, 700, and the Coptic versions, the Vulgate, the Peshitta and Harklean Syriac; also Origen
  • 𝔐 and TR: τίνα με λέγουσιν οἱ ἄνθρωποι εἶναι, τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου; (tina me legousin hoi anthrōpoi einai, ton huion tou anthrōpou?), “Who do people say that I, the Son of Man, am? (KJV: “Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?”)”Witnesses: Codex Bezae (D, 5th c.), uncials K, L, P, Δ, Codex Koridethi (Θ, 9th c.), Family 13 (f¹³), minuscules 33, 565, 892, 1241, 1424, the majority of later Greek manuscripts (𝔐), and Old Latin manuscripts; similar in C and W; also Irenaeus (Latin)

Why the editors chose the NA28 reading: “Me” matches Mark 8:27 and Luke 9:18 (“Who do the crowds say that I am?”) and was likely added to bring Matthew into line.

Effect on the translation: Slight: with “me,” Jesus identifies Himself as the Son of Man in the question itself.

† 16:19 — I will give you ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text): δώσω σοι (dōsō soi), “I will give you”Witnesses: Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ, 4th c.), Codex Vaticanus as first written (B∗, 4th c.), and Family 1 (f¹), and some Coptic manuscripts
  • 𝔐 and TR: καὶ δώσω σοι (kai dōsō soi), “And I will give you”Witnesses: a corrector of Codex Vaticanus, uncials K, W, Γ, Δ, Family 13 (f¹³), minuscules 565, 579, 700, 892, 1241, and the majority of later Greek manuscripts (𝔐); also Eusebius

Effect on the translation: None in meaning.

† 16:20 — He strictly ordered ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text), 𝔐 and TR: διεστείλατο (diesteilato), “He strictly ordered”Witnesses: Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ, 4th c.), a corrector of Codex Vaticanus, Codex Ephraemi (C, 5th c.), uncials K, L, W, Γ, Δ, Codex Koridethi (Θ, 9th c.), Family 1 (f¹), Family 13 (f¹³), minuscules 565, 700, 892, 1241, 1424, the majority of later Greek manuscripts (𝔐), most Latin witnesses, and the Coptic versions
  • Other manuscripts: ἐπετίμησεν (epetimēsen), “He sternly warned”Witnesses: Codex Vaticanus as first written (B∗, 4th c.), Codex Bezae (D, 5th c.), Old Latin e, and the Curetonian Syriac; also some manuscripts known to Origen

Why the editors chose the NA28 reading: “Sternly warned” is Mark’s verb (Mark 8:30), and scribes often brought Matthew into line with Mark.

Effect on the translation: Slight.

† 16:20 — the disciples … that He was the Messiah ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text): τοῖς μαθηταῖς … ὅτι αὐτός ἐστιν ὁ χριστός (tois mathētais … hoti autos estin ho christos), “the disciples … that He was the Messiah”Witnesses: Codex Sinaiticus as first written (ℵ∗, 4th c.), Codex Vaticanus (B, 4th c.), Codex Regius (L, 8th c.), Δ, Codex Koridethi (Θ, 9th c.), Family 1 (f¹), Family 13 (f¹³), and minuscules 565, 700, 1424; also Origen
  • 𝔐 and TR: τοῖς μαθηταῖς αὐτοῦ … ὅτι αὐτός ἐστιν Ἰησοῦς ὁ χριστός (tois mathētais autou … hoti autos estin Iēsous ho christos), “His disciples … that He was Jesus the Messiah (KJV: “that he was Jesus the Christ”)”Witnesses: For “Jesus”: a corrector of Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ²), Codex Ephraemi (C, 5th c.), minuscules 579, 892, 1241, the majority of later Greek manuscripts (𝔐), most Latin witnesses, and the Bohairic Coptic, and the Harklean Syriac

Why the editors chose the NA28 reading: “Jesus” before “the Messiah” reflects the church’s confession “Jesus is the Messiah” and is not found in the earliest form of Sinaiticus or in Vaticanus.

Effect on the translation: Slight.

† 16:21 — Jesus began to show ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text), 𝔐 and TR: ἤρξατο ὁ Ἰησοῦς (ērxato ho Iēsous), “Jesus began”Witnesses: Codex Ephraemi (C, 5th c.), uncials K, L, W, Γ, Δ, Codex Koridethi (Θ, 9th c.), Family 1 (f¹), Family 13 (f¹³), minuscules 565, 700, 1241, 1424, the majority of later Greek manuscripts (𝔐), all the Latin witnesses, and the Syriac versions
  • Codex Sinaiticus (first hand) and Codex Vaticanus (first hand): ἤρξατο Ἰησοῦς Χριστός (ērxato Iēsous Christos), “Jesus Christ began”Witnesses: Codex Sinaiticus as first written (ℵ∗, 4th c.), and Codex Vaticanus as first written (B∗, 4th c.), with some Coptic manuscripts

Why the editors chose the NA28 reading: “Jesus Christ” as a name in the narrative is rare in the Gospels (compare 1:1, 18); the double name has strong early support but may come from early Christian usage. NA28 reads “Jesus,” with most manuscripts.

Effect on the translation: Slight, though notable: the two oldest manuscripts, as first written, call Him “Jesus Christ” at the turning point of the Gospel.

† 16:21 — on the third day be raised ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text), 𝔐 and TR: τῇ τρίτῃ ἡμέρᾳ ἐγερθῆναι (tē tritē hēmera egerthēnai), “on the third day be raised”Witnesses: nearly all manuscripts
  • Codex Bezae: μετὰ τρεῖς ἡμέρας ἀναστῆναι (meta treis hēmeras anastēnai), “after three days rise”Witnesses: Codex Bezae (D, 5th c.), with some Old Latin and Bohairic witnesses

Why the editors chose the NA28 reading: Bezae’s wording matches Mark 8:31, a typical harmonization; it is noted because it changes the time phrase.

Effect on the translation: Slight: “on the third day” and “after three days” describe the same event in different idioms.

† 16:26 — what will it profit ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text): τί γὰρ ὠφεληθήσεται ἄνθρωπος (ti gar ōphelēthēsetai anthrōpos), “For what will it profit a person”Witnesses: Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ, 4th c.), Codex Vaticanus (B, 4th c.), Codex Regius (L, 8th c.), Codex Koridethi (Θ, 9th c.), Family 1 (f¹), Family 13 (f¹³), minuscules 33, 579, 700, 892, and the Coptic versions; also Origen and Cyril
  • 𝔐 and TR: τί γὰρ ὠφελεῖται ἄνθρωπος (ti gar ōpheleitai anthrōpos), “For what is a man profited (KJV)”Witnesses: Codex Ephraemi (C, 5th c.), Codex Bezae (D, 5th c.), uncials K, W, Γ, Δ, minuscules 565, 1241, 1424, the majority of later Greek manuscripts (𝔐), and most Latin witnesses; also Justin

Why the editors chose the NA28 reading: The present tense matches Mark 8:36 and Luke 9:25.

Effect on the translation: Slight: future “will it profit” or present “is he profited.”

† 16:27 — according to his conduct ↩ back to text

  • NA28/UBS5 (TWB text), 𝔐 and TR: κατὰ τὴν πρᾶξιν αὐτοῦ (kata tēn praxin autou), “according to his conduct”Witnesses: most manuscripts
  • Other manuscripts: κατὰ τὰ ἔργα αὐτοῦ (kata ta erga autou), “according to his works”Witnesses: Codex Sinaiticus as first written (ℵ∗, 4th c.), minuscule 1424, Old Latin manuscripts, the Syriac versions, and the Coptic versions

Why the editors chose the NA28 reading: “Works” is the wording of Psalm 62:12 and Proverbs 24:12 in the Septuagint, and scribes likely conformed the saying to the familiar verse.

Effect on the translation: Slight.

Choose a chapter

Old Testament3 of 929 chapters · <1%

Genesis3 of 50 · 6%
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950
ExodusComing soon
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
LeviticusComing soon
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627
NumbersComing soon
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536
DeuteronomyComing soon
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
JoshuaComing soon
123456789101112131415161718192021222324
JudgesComing soon
123456789101112131415161718192021
RuthComing soon
1234
1 SamuelComing soon
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031
2 SamuelComing soon
123456789101112131415161718192021222324
1 KingsComing soon
12345678910111213141516171819202122
2 KingsComing soon
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
1 ChroniclesComing soon
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
2 ChroniclesComing soon
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536
EzraComing soon
12345678910
NehemiahComing soon
12345678910111213
EstherComing soon
12345678910
JobComing soon
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142
PsalmsComing soon
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150
ProverbsComing soon
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031
EcclesiastesComing soon
123456789101112
Song of SongsComing soon
12345678
IsaiahComing soon
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566
JeremiahComing soon
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152
LamentationsComing soon
12345
EzekielComing soon
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748
DanielComing soon
123456789101112
HoseaComing soon
1234567891011121314
JoelComing soon
123
AmosComing soon
123456789
ObadiahComing soon
1
JonahComing soon
1234
MicahComing soon
1234567
NahumComing soon
123
HabakkukComing soon
123
ZephaniahComing soon
123
HaggaiComing soon
12
ZechariahComing soon
1234567891011121314
MalachiComing soon
1234

New Testament16 of 260 chapters · 6%

Matthew16 of 28 · 57%
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
MarkComing soon
12345678910111213141516
LukeComing soon
123456789101112131415161718192021222324
JohnComing soon
123456789101112131415161718192021
ActsComing soon
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
RomansComing soon
12345678910111213141516
1 CorinthiansComing soon
12345678910111213141516
2 CorinthiansComing soon
12345678910111213
GalatiansComing soon
123456
EphesiansComing soon
123456
PhilippiansComing soon
1234
ColossiansComing soon
1234
1 ThessaloniansComing soon
12345
2 ThessaloniansComing soon
123
1 TimothyComing soon
123456
2 TimothyComing soon
1234
TitusComing soon
123
PhilemonComing soon
1
HebrewsComing soon
12345678910111213
JamesComing soon
12345
1 PeterComing soon
12345
2 PeterComing soon
123
1 JohnComing soon
12345
2 JohnComing soon
1
3 JohnComing soon
1
JudeComing soon
1
RevelationComing soon
12345678910111213141516171819202122

Book InsightsMatthew

Author

Matthew, also called Levi, the tax collector whom Jesus called to follow Him and who became one of the Twelve (9:9; 10:3; compare Mark 2:14; Luke 5:27). The Gospel does not name its author, but the evidence for Matthew is strong:

  • Unanimous early testimony. Every ancient manuscript that preserves a title reads “According to Matthew” (Κατὰ Μαθθαῖον Kata Maththaion), and no other author was ever proposed. Papias, bishop of Hierapolis in the early 2nd century A.D., wrote that “Matthew compiled the sayings (λόγια logia) in the Hebrew language” (quoted by Eusebius, Church History 3.39.16). Irenaeus (c. A.D. 180), Origen, Eusebius, and Jerome all name Matthew.
  • Clues in the text. Only this Gospel calls the converted tax collector “Matthew” (9:9) and lists him as “Matthew the tax collector” (10:3), a humble self-reference. It has the most interest in money: the temple tax (17:24–27), the coin of the tribute (22:19, where Matthew alone uses the technical term νόμισμα nomisma), and talents and debts (18:23–35; 25:14–30). A tax collector would have been literate and used to keeping careful records, probably in Greek as well as Aramaic.
  • Matthew first. In John Wenham, Redating Matthew, Mark and Luke (1991), John Wenham argues that the early church’s order is correct: Matthew wrote first, then Mark, then Luke. Clement of Alexandria reported that “the Gospels containing the genealogies were written first” (Eusebius, Church History 6.14.5), which places Matthew and Luke before Mark, and every early writer who names an order puts Matthew first.
  • One shared teaching, with some borrowing. Wenham’s own model is “an oral theory with some measure of successive dependence.” All three Gospels draw on the Jerusalem catechesis, the apostles’ carefully taught oral account of Jesus’ words and deeds. On top of that shared teaching, Mark made some use of Matthew, and Luke made some use of both Matthew and Mark. On this view the hypothetical source Q is unnecessary, and each Gospel is an independent witness to the apostolic preaching.

Papias’s report that Matthew wrote “in the Hebrew language” is read by many who hold Matthew’s priority as evidence of an earlier Hebrew or Aramaic edition, followed by the Greek Gospel we have; others take it to describe a Hebrew style of writing or a collection of sayings.

Other views — What Papias meant

Papias’s words are debated. Some take them to mean Matthew first wrote a Hebrew or Aramaic Gospel that was later translated into the Greek we have. Others think he meant a collection of Jesus’ sayings rather than this Gospel. Still others read “in the Hebrew language” as “in a Hebrew style.” Our Greek Matthew does not read like a translation, and it often quotes the Old Testament from the Septuagint.

Other views — The Synoptic Problem

Most scholars today explain the shared material in Matthew, Mark, and Luke differently from Wenham:

  • Two-Source Hypothesis (the majority view): Mark wrote first. Matthew and Luke each used Mark plus a lost collection of Jesus’ sayings called Q, from the German Quelle (“source”). Material found only in Matthew is often labeled M.
  • Farrer Hypothesis: Mark wrote first, Matthew used Mark, and Luke used both, so no Q is needed.
  • Two-Gospel (Griesbach) Hypothesis: Matthew wrote first, Luke used Matthew, and Mark combined both. Wenham charts what this would require in Mark 1:1–13: Mark switching between Matthew, Luke, and his own words every few words, a process he finds implausible (pp. 13–15).

Supporters of Mark’s priority point to Mark’s rougher Greek, which Matthew and Luke seem to smooth, and to Matthew’s inclusion of nearly all of Mark. No manuscript of Q has ever been found. Many conservative scholars hold Mark’s priority and still affirm the apostle Matthew as author.

Other views — An unnamed Jewish-Christian author

Many critical scholars hold that the Gospel was written by an unknown Jewish believer, perhaps a scribe trained for the kingdom (13:52), and later attached to Matthew’s name. They argue that an eyewitness apostle would not have relied on Mark, who was not one of the Twelve.

Audience

Primarily Jewish believers, along with Jews being invited to believe. Matthew assumes his readers know the Law, the Prophets, and Jewish customs. He leaves customs unexplained that Mark explains for Gentiles (compare 15:2 with Mark 7:3–4), and traces Jesus’ line back to Abraham. Out of reverence he usually says “kingdom of heaven” rather than “kingdom of God.” Yet the Gospel looks outward from the start, with Gentile magi at the cradle (2:1–12), and ends with the command to make disciples of all nations (28:19).

Date Written

c. A.D. 40–65, before the Romans destroyed Jerusalem and the temple in A.D. 70. Conservative scholars hold two main positions within that range.

c. A.D. 50–65. Matthew writes as though the temple is still standing: he includes instructions about offering gifts at the altar (5:23–24), paying the temple tax (17:24–27), and swearing by the temple (23:16–22). Twice he says something remains “to this day” (27:8; 28:15). Jesus predicts the temple’s fall (24:1–2), but the Gospel never reports it as having happened. Many conservative scholars, including those who hold that Matthew used Mark, place the Gospel in this period.

c. A.D. 40 (John Wenham). Those who hold Matthean priority often place it earlier still, in the A.D. 40s or 50s. Wenham reaches c. A.D. 40 by working back from Acts:

  • Acts was finished in A.D. 62. It ends with Paul two years under house arrest in Rome (Acts 28:30–31) and says nothing of his death (c. A.D. 67), the great fire of Rome and Nero’s persecution (A.D. 64), the outbreak of the Jewish War (A.D. 66), or the fall of Jerusalem (A.D. 70).
  • Luke came before Acts (Acts 1:1). Wenham dates Luke to about A.D. 54 and identifies Luke with “the brother whose praise is in the gospel” (2 Corinthians 8:18), in a letter he dates to A.D. 56.
  • Mark came before Luke, about A.D. 45, from Peter’s preaching in Rome. Wenham reads Peter’s escape from Herod Agrippa I to “another place” (Acts 12:17, A.D. 42) as his journey to Rome.
  • Matthew came first, about A.D. 40, before the persecution under Herod Agrippa I scattered the apostles from Jerusalem in A.D. 42 (Acts 12:1–17). Eusebius says Matthew wrote for the Hebrews when he was about to leave them to preach to others (Church History 3.24.6).

Source for Wenham’s dates: John Wenham, Redating Matthew, Mark and Luke (1991), Chronological Table, pp. xxv–xxvi.

Other views — Critical dating (c. A.D. 80–90)

Many critical scholars date Matthew after A.D. 70. They reason that Matthew used Mark, usually dated around A.D. 65–70, and that the parable of the king who “burned their city” (22:7) looks back on Jerusalem’s fall. They also point to sharp conflict with synagogue leaders (23:34), which they place in the decades after the war. Conservative scholars respond that 22:7 uses the common language of ancient warfare and judgment (compare Judges 1:8; Isaiah 1:7), not specific details of A.D. 70, and that predictive prophecy should not be ruled out in advance.

Location Written

Judea, most likely Jerusalem. Wenham, following the early tradition, places Matthew’s writing in the land of Israel for Jewish believers before the apostles left Jerusalem.

  • Early testimony. Irenaeus says Matthew wrote “among the Hebrews” (Against Heresies 3.1.1), and Eusebius says he wrote for them before leaving to preach to others (Church History 3.24.6).
  • The audience. The Gospel assumes readers who know Jewish customs without explanation (compare 15:2 with Mark 7:3–4), care about the temple and the Law, and need answers to questions raised by the synagogue.

Other views — Other proposed places

Many scholars, conservative and critical, suggest Syrian Antioch, a city with a large Jewish population and an early church of both Jews and Gentiles (Acts 11:19–26). Ignatius, bishop of Antioch (c. A.D. 110), is the earliest writer to show clear knowledge of Matthew. Galilee, Caesarea Maritima, and Phoenicia have also been suggested.

Purpose

To show that Jesus is the promised Messiah (Χριστός Christos), the Son of David and Son of Abraham (1:1). He fulfills the Law and the Prophets and brings the kingdom of heaven near. Matthew also trains disciples in how to live under that kingdom, and sends them to make disciples of every nation.

Matthew does this through two patterns. Ten times he introduces an Old Testament text with a fulfillment formula such as “this took place to fulfill what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet” (1:22; 2:15, 17, 23; 4:14; 8:17; 12:17; 13:35; 21:4; 27:9). He also gathers Jesus’ teaching into five great discourses, each closing with “when Jesus had finished” (7:28; 11:1; 13:53; 19:1; 26:1). Many readers see an echo of the five books of Moses:

  • The Sermon on the Mount (chapters 5–7)
  • Instructions to the Twelve (chapter 10)
  • Parables of the kingdom (chapter 13)
  • Life in the community (chapter 18)
  • The Olivet Discourse, on the end of the age (chapters 24–25)

Historical Problem Being Addressed

Jewish believers faced a hard question. If Jesus is Israel’s Messiah, why did Israel’s own leaders reject Him and hand Him over to be crucified? And why were Gentiles now streaming into the people of God? Believers were being opposed in the synagogues (10:17; 23:34) and needed to know that following Jesus was not abandoning the faith of Abraham and Moses, but its fulfillment. Matthew answers that the rejection itself was foretold. Jesus came not to abolish the Law but to fulfill it (5:17), and Abraham’s family was always meant to bless the nations (8:11; 28:19).

Through the Original Readers’ Eyes

Matthew’s first readers lived in a land ruled by Rome through Herod’s family and Roman governors (2:1, 22; 27:2), worshiping in synagogues and arguing over how to keep the Law. Several things they knew shape how they heard this Gospel:

  • Hope for a Son of David. Many Jews longed for a king who would restore Israel. The Psalms of Solomon (1st century B.C.) pray for “the son of David” to purge Jerusalem of Gentiles and rule in righteousness (Psalms of Solomon 17). Some Qumran texts expect both a royal and a priestly messiah (1QS 9:11). Matthew’s Son of David heals the blind and lame (21:14) and dies under the charge “King of the Jews.”
  • The Son of Man. Daniel 7 pictures one like a son of man receiving everlasting dominion. The Similitudes of Enoch (1 Enoch 37–71, whose date is debated) speak of a heavenly Son of Man who judges from a glorious throne. Readers who knew these texts would hear Jesus’ favorite self-designation as a claim to that throne (19:28; 25:31).
  • Caesar’s claims. Augustus was called “son of god” (divi filius), and an inscription from Priene (9 B.C.) calls his birthday the beginning of “good news” (εὐαγγέλια euangelia) for the world. A Gospel announcing a different King, a different Son of God, and a different kingdom would have sounded like a rival claim.
  • Pharisees, scribes, and synagogues. The disputes over Sabbath, purity, oaths, and tithing (chapters 12, 15, 23) were live questions for Jewish communities. Matthew’s readers needed to know how Jesus’ followers related to the Law and to the synagogue leaders.

Among the early church, Matthew quickly became the most quoted Gospel. The Didache (late 1st or early 2nd century) gives the Lord’s Prayer in a form very close to Matthew’s (Didache 8:2), and Ignatius of Antioch (c. A.D. 110) shows knowledge of it. It was placed first in the New Testament, as the bridge from Israel’s Scriptures to the gospel.

Key Words

Kingdom of heaven: βασιλεία τῶν οὐρανῶν basileia tōn ouranōn

The phrase appears more than thirty times in Matthew and nowhere else in the New Testament. Following Jewish reverence for God’s name, “heaven” stands for God Himself, so it means the same as “kingdom of God,” which Matthew also uses a few times (12:28; 19:24; 21:31, 43).

Fulfill: πληρόω plēroō

Ten times Matthew introduces an Old Testament text with a fulfillment formula (1:22; 2:15, 17, 23; 4:14; 8:17; 12:17; 13:35; 21:4; 27:9), and Jesus says He came to fulfill the Law and the Prophets (5:17). In Matthew, fulfillment means more than prediction coming true: Israel’s story and Scripture reach their goal in Jesus.

Righteousness: δικαιοσύνη dikaiosynē

Jesus is baptized “to fulfill all righteousness” (3:15), and His disciples must hunger for righteousness (5:6), have a righteousness greater than that of the scribes and Pharisees (5:20), and seek first God’s kingdom and His righteousness (6:33). It names the life that matches God’s will.

Key Verses

Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. Matthew 5:17 (TWB)

The main key verse: Jesus came not to abolish the Law or the Prophets but to fulfill them. The whole Gospel unfolds this claim.

And Simon Peter answered and said, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.”Matthew 16:16 (TWB)

Peter’s confession, the turning point of the Gospel: Jesus is the Messiah (Χριστός Christos), the Son of the living God.

Matthew 28:18–20

The Great Commission: the risen Jesus, with all authority in heaven and on earth, sends His disciples to make disciples of all nations, and promises to be with them always, echoing “Immanuel, God with us” (1:23).

Outline

Matthew alternates narrative with five major blocks of teaching, each ending with “when Jesus had finished” (7:28; 11:1; 13:53; 19:1; 26:1).

  1. The coming of the King 1:1–4:25
    1. Genealogy, birth, and infancy 1:1–2:23
    2. John the Baptist, the baptism, and the temptation 3:1–4:11
    3. Ministry in Galilee begins 4:12–25
  2. First discourse: the Sermon on the Mount 5:1–7:29
  3. Mighty works: ten miracles 8:1–9:38
  4. Second discourse: sending out the Twelve 10:1–11:1
  5. Growing opposition 11:2–12:50
  6. Third discourse: parables of the kingdom 13:1–53
  7. Peter’s confession and the road to the cross 13:54–17:27 You are here
  8. Fourth discourse: life in the community 18:1–19:1
  9. In Judea and Jerusalem 19:2–23:39
  10. Fifth discourse: the Olivet Discourse 24:1–25:46
  11. Death and resurrection; the Great Commission 26:1–28:20

Christ in the Book

Matthew presents Jesus above all as the King.

  • The Son of David, heir to the throne promised in 2 Samuel 7:12–16 (1:1; 9:27; 12:23; 20:30–31; 21:9).
  • The Son of Abraham, the seed through whom the nations are blessed (1:1; compare Genesis 12:3; 22:18).
  • Immanuel, “God with us” (1:23, quoting Isaiah 7:14). The Gospel ends where it began: “I am with you always” (28:20).
  • The Messiah, the Son of the living God, as Peter confesses at Caesarea Philippi (16:16), where TWB renders Χριστός Christos as “Messiah.”
  • The new Moses: spared as an infant from a king’s slaughter (2:13–18; compare Exodus 1:22–2:10), called out of Egypt (2:15, quoting Hosea 11:1), and teaching from the mountain (5:1).
  • The Son of Man of Daniel 7:13–14, who receives dominion and comes on the clouds (24:30; 26:64).
  • Greater than the temple, Jonah, and Solomon (12:6, 41–42).
  • The Servant of Isaiah, who carries our sicknesses and brings justice to the nations (8:17; 12:17–21).
  • The humble King riding into Jerusalem (21:5, quoting Zechariah 9:9), crucified under the charge “This is Jesus, the King of the Jews” (27:37).
  • The risen Lord with all authority in heaven and on earth (28:18).

The Divine Council Worldview in the Book

What is the Divine Council Worldview?

The Divine Council Worldview reads Scripture the way its first readers did. The Lord, God Most High, presides over a heavenly assembly of spiritual beings, called “sons of God,” “holy ones,” and “gods” (אֱלֹהִים ʾĕlōhîm) (Psalm 82:1; Psalm 89:5–7; 1 Kings 22:19–22; Job 1:6). He alone is Creator, and none of them is like Him (Psalm 89:6; Exodus 15:11). Some of these beings rebelled: in Eden, before the flood, and at Babel, after which the nations were placed under lesser powers while the Lord took Israel as His own portion (Deuteronomy 32:8–9). The rest of Scripture tells how God reclaims the nations through the Messiah. Not every interpreter reads these texts this way; where views differ, they are noted.

Matthew presents Jesus’ ministry as the beginning of God’s campaign to take back the nations from the powers that rebelled at Babel. The kingdom of heaven advances against an opposing kingdom.

  • The kingdoms of the world (4:8–9). The devil offers Jesus “all the kingdoms of the world and their glory” if He will worship him. On a Divine Council reading, the offer is real because the nations had been placed under other powers (Deuteronomy 32:8–9; compare Luke 4:6; John 12:31). Jesus refuses to receive the nations from the rebel and quotes Deuteronomy: “You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only shall you serve” (4:10).
  • Binding the strong man (12:28–29). Jesus’ exorcisms show that “the kingdom of God has come upon you.” He enters Satan’s house, binds the strong man, and plunders it.
  • The gates of Hades (16:13–18). Peter confesses Jesus as the Messiah at Caesarea Philippi, at the foot of Mount Hermon. A cave there held a shrine to the god Pan and was thought to be a gateway to the underworld, and Jewish tradition remembered Hermon as where the rebellious sons of God of Genesis 6 came down (1 Enoch 6:6). There Jesus promises that “the gates of Hades will not prevail” against His church.
  • The high mountain (17:1–8). Six days later Jesus is transfigured on “a high mountain.” Many scholars think this was Hermon itself, given its height and nearness to Caesarea Philippi; tradition since the 4th century has favored Mount Tabor.
  • Their angels (18:10). The little ones have angels who “always see the face of My Father in heaven,” a picture of heavenly beings attending God’s presence.
  • The Son of Man and the thrones (19:28; 26:64). Jesus draws on Daniel 7, where thrones are set up, the court sits, and one like a son of man receives the dominion over the nations (Daniel 7:9–14). He promises the Twelve that they will sit on twelve thrones, so that redeemed humans share in God’s rule.
  • The devil and his angels (25:41). The eternal fire was “prepared for the devil and his angels,” not originally for people.
  • All authority, all nations (28:18–20). The risen Jesus claims “all authority in heaven and on earth” and sends His disciples to make disciples of “all the nations” (πάντα τὰ ἔθνη panta ta ethnē), the very nations once given over at Babel.

Divine Council notes in the chapters translated so far

How the Book Connects to Other Books

  • Genesis: Matthew opens with “the book of the genealogy” (βίβλος γενέσεως biblos geneseōs, 1:1), the same wording the Septuagint uses in Genesis 2:4 and 5:1. A new beginning is announced in the language of the first one.
  • 2 Chronicles and Malachi: In the order of the Hebrew Bible, the Scriptures close with 2 Chronicles, which opens with genealogies and ends with an invitation to go up to Jerusalem (2 Chronicles 36:23). Matthew opens with a genealogy. In the Christian order, Malachi’s promise of Elijah (Malachi 4:5) leads into John the Baptist, whom Jesus identifies as that Elijah (11:14; 17:12–13).
  • The Prophets: Matthew quotes or echoes the Old Testament more than any other Gospel, including Isaiah 7:14 (1:23), Micah 5:2 (2:6), Hosea 11:1 (2:15), Jeremiah 31:15 (2:18), and Zechariah 9:9 (21:5).
  • Mark and Luke tell much of the same story (see the Synoptic Problem under Author), and John complements them with Jesus’ ministry in Judea.
  • Acts carries out the Great Commission (28:18–20), beginning in Jerusalem and reaching the nations (Acts 1:8).
  • James echoes the Sermon on the Mount more closely than any other letter (compare 5:3 with James 2:5; 5:11–12 with James 1:2; 5:34–37 with James 5:12; 7:7 with James 1:5).
  • Revelation: the Son of Man coming with the clouds (24:30; Revelation 1:7) and the kingdom of the world becoming the kingdom of our Lord and of His Messiah (Revelation 11:15).

TWB Translation Decisions

The main rendering decisions made so far in Matthew. Each one with a study note links to it.

“Messiah” for Χριστός

TWB renders Χριστός Christos as “Messiah” throughout, showing that it is a title (“Anointed One”) rather than a surname. The notes show the Greek wherever it matters.

Speech colors

Jesus’ words are printed in red and God the Father’s in blue (for example, the voice from heaven at the baptism, 3:17). The words of ordinary angels, such as the angel who speaks to Joseph in dreams (2:13, 19–20), are not colored.

Old Testament quotations in capitals

Direct quotations of the Old Testament are printed in capitals, so readers can see where Matthew is citing Scripture (for example, Micah 5:2 at 2:6 and Hosea 11:1 at 2:15).

Read the full note →

“Magi” (2:1)

Rather than “wise men,” which hides their priestly and astrological role, or “magicians,” which gives a negative sense Matthew does not intend.

Read the full note →

“His star at its rising” (2:2)

Not “in the east”: the singular with the article is an astronomical expression for a star’s rising.

Read the full note →

“Worship” (2:2, 11)

For προσκυνέω proskyneō, rather than “pay homage,” because Matthew uses the same verb for the disciples’ worship of Jesus (14:33; 28:9, 17).

Read the full note →

“He had been mocked” (2:16)

Rather than “tricked,” to keep the link with the mockery of Jesus at His trial and crucifixion, where Matthew uses the same verb.

Read the full note →

“That He would be called a Nazarene” (2:23)

Rendered as indirect speech, without quotation marks or capitals, because the words are not found in any one Old Testament book.

Read the full note →

Textual Notes

Base text: Nestle-Aland, 28th edition (NA28). Where the Majority Text or Textus Receptus reads differently, the notes record both readings and the manuscripts behind them.

The doxology of the Lord’s Prayer 6:13

“For Yours is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever. Amen.” is found in the Majority Text and the Textus Receptus but not in the earliest manuscripts, including Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus. A shorter doxology appears in the Didache (8:2), which shows it was used in worship very early. TWB follows NA28 and records the longer reading in the note.

Verses not found in the earliest manuscripts 17:21

Three verses found in the Majority Text and Textus Receptus are absent from the earliest manuscripts: 17:21 (“this kind does not go out except by prayer and fasting”), 18:11 (“the Son of Man came to save the lost”), and 23:14 (on devouring widows’ houses). Each closely matches a verse in another Gospel (Mark 9:29; Luke 19:10; Mark 12:40), and most scholars think scribes added them from there. Supporters of the Majority Text regard them as original. TWB follows NA28 and records each in the notes.

“Without cause” 5:22

The Majority Text and Textus Receptus read “whoever is angry with his brother without cause” (εἰκῆ eikē). The earliest manuscripts lack the phrase, which softens Jesus’ saying. TWB follows NA28.

The spear at the cross 27:49

Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus add that a soldier pierced Jesus’ side with a spear before He died, wording that closely matches John 19:34. NA28 places it in the apparatus, judging it an early addition from John.

Textual notes in the chapters translated so far

Contested Questions

Major questions on which careful readers and Christian traditions disagree. TWB states each view fairly and does not take a side, per the Master Specification Record.

What is “this rock” in Matthew 16:18?
Peter, with a continuing office

Jesus plays on Peter’s name (Πέτρος Petros, “rock”) and builds the church on him, giving him the keys (16:19). Catholic teaching sees this office continued in Peter’s successors, the bishops of Rome.

Peter, as the first apostle

The rock is Peter himself, as the leading apostle and first preacher (Acts 2; 10), without a line of successors. Held by many Protestant scholars today.

Peter’s confession of faith

The rock is the truth Peter confessed, that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of the living God (16:16). Common in Orthodox and in much Protestant teaching; Orthodox tradition also sees every bishop as sharing Peter’s ministry.

Christ Himself

The rock is Christ, the one foundation (1 Corinthians 3:11; compare 1 Peter 2:4–8). Augustine argued for this reading in some of his writings.

What does the exception for “sexual immorality” allow (5:32; 19:9)?
Divorce and remarriage after adultery

Sexual unfaithfulness (πορνεία porneia) breaks the marriage, so the innocent party may divorce and remarry. Held in most Protestant traditions.

Separation without remarriage

A valid sacramental marriage cannot be dissolved; the exception allows separation, or applies to unions that were never valid marriages (the basis of annulment). Catholic teaching.

Remarriage permitted by pastoral mercy

Marriage is meant to be lifelong, but the church may permit a second marriage after divorce as an act of mercy (οἰκονομία oikonomia). Orthodox practice.

A narrow case

πορνεία porneia refers to unfaithfulness during betrothal (as Joseph suspected of Mary, 1:19) or to marriages within forbidden family relationships (Leviticus 18; Acts 15:29).

When is the Olivet Discourse (chapter 24) fulfilled?
In A.D. 70

Most of the discourse was fulfilled when Rome destroyed Jerusalem and the temple, within “this generation” (24:34). Held by preterist interpreters.

At the end of the age

The discourse describes events still future, before Christ’s return. Held by futurist interpreters.

Both

The fall of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 fulfills the near prophecy and foreshadows the final judgment at Christ’s return. Held by many interpreters across traditions.

Did Mary have other children (1:25; 13:55)?
Mary remained a virgin

“Until” (1:25) does not imply anything afterward, and Jesus’ “brothers” (13:55) were relatives. Catholic and Orthodox teaching, and held by Luther and other early Reformers. Orthodox tradition sees them as Joseph’s children from an earlier marriage; Catholic tradition, following Jerome, as cousins.

Mary and Joseph had other children

“Until” most naturally implies a normal marriage afterward, and the brothers and sisters named in 13:55–56 were younger children of Mary and Joseph. Held by most Protestants today.

Places in the Book

  • Babylon Identified first mentioned 1:11
  • Bethlehem Identified first mentioned 2:1
  • Judea Identified first mentioned 2:1
  • Jerusalem Identified first mentioned 2:1
  • Egypt Identified first mentioned 2:13
  • Ramah Identified first mentioned 2:18
  • Israel Identified first mentioned 2:20
  • Galilee Identified first mentioned 2:22
  • Nazareth Identified first mentioned 2:23
  • the wilderness Identified first mentioned 3:1
  • the Jordan Identified first mentioned 3:5
  • Capernaum Identified first mentioned 4:13
  • Zebulun Identified first mentioned 4:13
  • Naphtali Identified first mentioned 4:13
  • Sea of Galilee Identified first mentioned 4:18
  • Syria Identified first mentioned 4:24
  • Decapolis Identified first mentioned 4:25
  • the mountain Location unknown first mentioned 5:1
  • Gehenna Identified first mentioned 5:22
  • country of the Gadarenes Disputed first mentioned 8:28
  • Samaria Identified first mentioned 10:5
  • Sodom Disputed first mentioned 10:15
  • Gomorrah Disputed first mentioned 10:15
  • Chorazin Identified first mentioned 11:21
  • Bethsaida Disputed first mentioned 11:21
  • Tyre Identified first mentioned 11:21
  • Sidon Identified first mentioned 11:21
  • Nineveh Identified first mentioned 12:41
  • Gennesaret Identified first mentioned 14:34
  • Magadan Disputed first mentioned 15:39
  • Caesarea Philippi Identified first mentioned 16:13

The map shows unlabeled physical relief, with no modern borders or names. Hollow pins mark proposed sites for disputed places; places of unknown location are not pinned. This list grows as more chapters are translated.

The conservative view is given first; other views follow where scholars differ. Status: draft, version 0.7.0, updated 2026-10-10.